Multi-criteria decision analysis

From Systems Analysis Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a collection of methods and procedures for selecting, comparing, and evaluating alternatives when decisions must be made based on several, often competing, criteria. This approach reflects the complexity of real-world problems where it is impossible to reduce the choice to a single performance indicator.

Essence and Goals

Multi-criteria situations arise when various aspects of a solution's quality (e.g., cost, reliability, efficiency, sustainability) are significant to the decision-maker (DM) and require simultaneous consideration. The main goal of multi-criteria analysis is to find solutions that best satisfy all criteria or represent an optimal compromise among them.

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages of the multi-criteria approach:

  • Consideration of various aspects of the problem situation;
  • More flexible expression of the decision-maker's preferences;
  • Increased transparency in the decision-making process;
  • Ability to consider the interests of various stakeholders.

Limitations and challenges:

  • Difficulty in formalizing preferences and criteria weights;
  • Potential conflicts between criteria;
  • Incomparability of some alternatives;
  • Dependence of results on subjective assessments and scale structures.

Basic Principles

  1. Decomposition of overall quality into specific criteria: allows for a more accurate reflection of the preference structure and the situation being analyzed.
  2. Formation of a set of efficient (Pareto-optimal) solutions: used when it is not possible to aggregate all criteria in a single way.
  3. Compensation and weighting coefficients: assigned by the decision-maker or calculated according to formal rules, reflecting the relative importance of the criteria.
  4. Aggregation of criteria: transforming a multi-criteria problem into an equivalent single-criterion one using an aggregating function.
  5. Visualization methods: used to display achievable combinations of criteria values and facilitate choice.

Classification of Methods

Multi-criteria analysis methods are divided into several groups depending on the type of information and the form of preferences:

  • Methods based on quantitative indicators with numerical utility values;
  • Methods that convert qualitative assessments into numerical ones;
  • Comparison methods without calculating a numerical value;
  • Verbal analysis methods using linguistic judgments.

Examples of Methods

  • Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP);
  • Outranking methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE);
  • Methods with additive or multiplicative aggregation;
  • Human-machine iterative methods;
  • Methods based on choice functions.